![popehat twitter popehat twitter](https://www.popehat.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Smiley-150x150.jpg)
You’ll note that all of the names are the same names as listed in the subpoena above (as a point of clarification, the four users listed below were already in the conversation, so their metadata gets swept along, and then the tweeter, Justin Shafer, is also adding in to the conversation). The tweet is up as I write this, but here’s a screenshot in case it disappears:
![popehat twitter popehat twitter](https://www.popehat.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/332748_2377474442138_1408946748_2812859_1112382210_o.jpg)
Here’s the tweet and then I’ll get into the somewhat convoluted back story. Why the hell would the DOJ want all that? Would you believe it appears to be over a single tweet from someone to each of those five individuals that consists entirely of a smiley face? I wish I was kidding.
#Popehat twitter registration
Other subscriber numbers or identities, or associated accounts (including the registration Internet Protocol (“IP”) address).
#Popehat twitter serial numbers
Telephone or instrument numbers (including MAC addresses, Electronic Serial Numbers (“ESN”), Mobile Electronic Identity Numbers (“MEIN”), Mobile Equipment Identifier (“MEID”), Mobile Identification Numbers (“MIN”), Subscriber Identity Modules (“SIM”), Mobile Subscriber Integrated Services Digital Network Numbers (“MSISDND”), International Mobile Subscriber Identifier (“IMSI”), or International Mobile Equipment Identities (“IMEI”)).Length of service (including start date) and types of service utilized.Records of session times and durations, and the temporarily assigned network addresses (such as Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses) associated with those sessions.Addresses (including mailing addresses, residential addresses, business addresses, and e-mail addresses).
![popehat twitter popehat twitter](https://www.popehat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/disturbedbilltwitter1-360x640.jpg)
Names (including subscriber names, user names, and screen names).Either way, they’re folks who are quite active in legal/privacy issues on Twitter.Īnd what info does the DOJ want on them? Well, basically everything: I’m pretty sure we’ve talked about three of those five in previous Techdirt posts. If you're looking for a link to your daughter's "Bratz"-collecting blog, do you really want to receive traffic from the people who come here to read about law, theism, Hegelian idealism, crime, or cannibal zombies and the destruction they wreak, destruction that can only be ended by killing the brain so the body will die? And we're mild-mannered men compared to some of our readers, who cuss like sailors.If you can’t see that, it’s a subpoena asking for information on the following five Twitter users: (“Mike Honcho”), (“Virgil”), (Ken White), (Keith Lee) and (Dissent Doe).
#Popehat twitter free
If you wish to join that company, bear in mind that we feel free to speak our minds about anything. We'd be happy to link to your blog, if you link to ours and meet our exacting standards (non-splog, non-porn, more than twenty posts, updated more than once every thirty days). Complaining to dad about mom's high-handed, arbitrary decision on your comment will only get you sent to the bushes, to cut a switch. If you're an orphan, we're like the Communist Party. But when it comes to YOU, we have one perspective. Different authors have different perspectives. Or we may arrange it that you can never read this site, much less comment here. If you go out of your way to cause trouble, we may not do anything. There's an invisible line that moves with our mood. If you think we're jerks, do a better job at that than we do. You comment as a guest, so please act like a guest we'd like to invite over again. This is our living room, not your living room. If you reasonably think that your comment was caught in it (say, if your comment hasn't appeared for a couple of days), feel free to drop us a line. We also use a robust comment-spam filter. That means the first time you comment, or if you include more than one link, one of us must approve the comment. You can contact Popehat authors at PolicyĬomments are moderated. Most of us are employed, but the site has nothing to do with our jobs, and isn't endorsed or approved by our employers. Popehat's authors write in their capacity as private citizens. The name "Popehat" arises from an inside joke, and isn't a religious reference of any sort. We talk about art, movies, books, and anything else that moves us. Our authors met on a now-defunct gaming website called Gone Gold we also like to talk about games and what you might call geek culture. But Popehat isn't a law blog, and what you read here isn't legal advice. Often its authors want to talk about free speech, liberty, criminal justice, the legal system and its foibles, and related issues. What is Popehat about? It's about whatever its authors want. It has undergone many changes in form and appearance, and its members have come and gone. Popehat is a group blog originally established in April 2004.